{"id":1283,"date":"2003-08-27T00:14:34","date_gmt":"2003-08-27T04:14:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/dbnews\/post-secondary-elearning-stocks\/"},"modified":"2003-08-27T00:14:34","modified_gmt":"2003-08-27T04:14:34","slug":"post-secondary-elearning-stocks","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/post-secondary-elearning-stocks\/","title":{"rendered":"Post-Secondary eLearning Stocks"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a790'><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Q&amp;A: Wall Street Bullish on Post-Secondary eLearning Stocks<\/p>\n<p>Companies selling technology into the post-secondary market<br \/>\nwill encounter good growth potential, according to analysts<br \/>\nat a recent financial analysts roundtable discussion. The<br \/>\ndiscussion, hosted by the Wall Street Transcript, included<br \/>\nGary E. Bisbee III, an analyst at Lehman Brothers, Gerald<br \/>\nOdening, managing director of Jefferies and Co., and Jeffrey<br \/>\nSilber, managing director at Harris Nesbitt Gerard<\/p>\n<p>Here is an excerpt from the discussion:  <\/p>\n<p>Q: What has gone on over the past year in the education<br \/>\nspace that&#8217;s important? <\/p>\n<p>Gerald Odening: Most of the questions coming up about this<br \/>\ngroup, which has performed superbly, have generally been<br \/>\nabout whether we are at a top in terms of valuation. My<br \/>\nfeeling is that the stock prices and multiples in the education<br \/>\ngroup for postsecondary will continue to rise. This is in contrast<br \/>\nto last year when a number of holders of the stocks were concerned<br \/>\nthat many people would be selling these stocks in 2003 when<br \/>\ntechnology and more cyclical sectors began to rebound. That didn&#8217;t<br \/>\nhappen, because year to date the postsecondary group is up over 60%. <\/p>\n<p>Q: What are the key drivers in this space over the next couple of years? <\/p>\n<p>Gary Bisbee: I think the drivers will continue to be similar to the<br \/>\ndrivers we&#8217;ve seen over the past couple of years. Due to the positive<br \/>\ndemographic backdrop, including a projected 15%-20% increase in total<br \/>\nstudent enrollment over the next decade, I think you&#8217;ll continue to<br \/>\nsee most of the publicly traded postsecondary companies adding<br \/>\nsomewhere between 5% and 10% new units per year. You&#8217;re going to<br \/>\nsee new campuses open in addition to acquisitions. I agree that<br \/>\nwe&#8217;ll continue to see a lot of those. <\/p>\n<p>On top of new schools, I think the pricing environment continues<br \/>\nto look strong, again, due to the state and local fiscal issues<br \/>\nthat we talked about earlier. So I think we should see a continuing<br \/>\ntrend of new campuses and also active strategies to grow the existing<br \/>\ncampuses. When combined with pricing and margin expansion I think the<br \/>\nmodel will be 15% student growth plus 5% pricing, which will give us<br \/>\n20% internal top-line growth, and with a bit of margin expansion<br \/>\n20%-25% earnings growth. <\/p>\n<p>Big picture drivers for the industry and these stocks continue to be<br \/>\nthe demographic outlook, the state funding issues that are leading<br \/>\nthese companies to gain market share, and the online trend. As Gerry<br \/>\nsaid, they&#8217;ve done a great job of attracting nontraditional students,<br \/>\nor students who were not successful in the traditional school system.<br \/>\nSo I think that another driver for these stocks will continue to be<br \/>\nthe online opportunities that they have. While the growth rates<br \/>\nprobably are unsustainable at the current levels, I think that a<br \/>\nlot of people have looked at the top line and haven&#8217;t focused enough<br \/>\non both the profitability and capital efficiency benefits of the<br \/>\nonline business model versus the campuses. Over time, I believe that<br \/>\nthe stocks can maintain their current multiple as people realize that<br \/>\nthe business model continues to improve. <\/p>\n<p>So in general I think the drivers will continue to be things that<br \/>\nhave driven growth in the past, which are good competitive positioning,<br \/>\ngaining market share, and continuing to innovate with online and other<br \/>\ndelivery methods. <\/p>\n<p>Q: What share of the market do the for-profits have at this point,<br \/>\nand where can it go over the next few years? <\/p>\n<p>Gary Bisbee: That&#8217;s a good question. By my estimate the for-profits<br \/>\nhave about 5% market share in 2003 as a percentage of enrollment,<br \/>\nand that number is up from about 1% in 1980. So there have been steady<br \/>\ngains. My expectation is that 5% can grow to be 8%-10% over the next<br \/>\ndecade, if not sooner. I think that the gains will be driven by pure<br \/>\nmarket share gains (mostly from the community colleges), in addition<br \/>\nto the for-profits&#8217; ability to continue to attract nontraditional<br \/>\nstudents. Today, about one in four Americans over the age of 25 has a<br \/>\nbachelor&#8217;s degree, so there are somewhere on the order of 70 million<br \/>\npeople in the US work force who don&#8217;t have a bachelor&#8217;s degree. While<br \/>\nmost of these people are nontraditional students, I believe that the<br \/>\nfor-profits have demonstrated that they focused on this group and can<br \/>\noffer a more convenient solution to these people. So I think they will<br \/>\ncontinue to grow.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/twst.com\/yhoo657.htm\">from the Wall Street Transcript (subscription)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Q&amp;A: Wall Street Bullish on Post-Secondary eLearning Stocks Companies selling technology into the post-secondary market will encounter good growth potential, according to analysts at a recent financial analysts roundtable discussion. The discussion, hosted by the Wall Street Transcript, included Gary &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/post-secondary-elearning-stocks\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":299,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1283","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1283","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/299"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1283"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1283\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1283"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}