{"id":144,"date":"2020-03-27T12:53:16","date_gmt":"2020-03-27T20:53:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.harvard.edu\/donnie\/?p=144"},"modified":"2020-03-27T12:53:16","modified_gmt":"2020-03-27T20:53:16","slug":"timeline-of-oracle-v-google-and-the-docket-files","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/donnie\/2020\/03\/27\/timeline-of-oracle-v-google-and-the-docket-files\/","title":{"rendered":"Timeline of Oracle v. Google and the docket files"},"content":{"rendered":"\r\n
\"\"
(This is an ongoing case and therefore this post will be updated along with the development.)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\r\n\r\n\r\nIssue: <\/strong>whether Oracle can claim a copyright on Java APIs and, if so, whether Google infringes these copyrights.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nIn order to allow developers to write their own programs for Android, Google’s implementation used the same names, organization, and functionality as the Java APIs.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nMay 2012, <\/strong>Judge William Alsup of the Northern District of California\u00a0ruled<\/a> that APIs are not subject to copyright: where \u201cthere is only one way to declare a given method functionality, [so that] everyone using that function must write that specific line of code in the same way,\u201d\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nOracle appealed to the ninth circuit. The circuit ruled<\/a> in favor of Oracle in May 2014, <\/strong>finding\u00a0that the Java APIs are copyrightable<\/a>, but leaving open the possibility that Google might have a fair use defense.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nGoogle filed a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court seeking review (on the issue of whether API is copyrightable) but failed. The case returned to the district court for trial.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nIn May 2016,<\/strong> a jury unanimously agreed that Google’s use of the Java APIs was fair use<\/a>. Oracle appealed.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nIn March 2018<\/strong>, the Federal Circuit reversed the district court. T<\/a>he Court rejected the jury’s verdict (after previously saying that the jury had to decide the case) and held that Google’s use was not fair use as a matter of law. Google appealed to the Supreme Court.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nThis time the SC granted the cert. Oral argument is expected in March 2020, and a decision by June.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nDocuments in Docket: <\/strong>\r\n\r\n\r\n

Supreme Court (2020)<\/h2>\r\n\r\n\r\nOracle Brief<\/a>\u00a0(February 12, 2020)\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nGoogle Opening Brief<\/a>\u00a0(January 6, 2020)\r\n\r\n\r\n

Amicus Briefs<\/h3>\r\n\r\n

In support of Respondent<\/h4>\r\n\r\n