{"id":47,"date":"2008-01-02T12:32:18","date_gmt":"2008-01-02T16:32:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/digitalnatives\/2008\/01\/02\/text-messaging-and-public-graf"},"modified":"2008-01-02T12:34:44","modified_gmt":"2008-01-02T16:34:44","slug":"text-messaging-and-public-graffiti","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/digitalnatives\/2008\/01\/02\/text-messaging-and-public-graffiti\/","title":{"rendered":"Text Messaging and Public Graffiti"},"content":{"rendered":"

There was a great article<\/a> in the Boston Globe yesterday about two Boston area companies, Aerva Inc<\/a>. and LocaModa Inc.<\/a>, that are pioneering so-called \u201cpublic graffiti spaces.\u201d In essence, they are connected displays that show content submitted via text messages. It is also broadcast online so that others can tune in to a given location and even submit content themselves. As \u201cout-of-home\u201d displays become more popular, I\u2019d like to discuss the current and future applications of this idea, as well as the implications it holds for digital identity and privacy.<\/p>\n

LocaModa Inc., which provides a service called Wiffiti (short for wireless graffiti) views interactive out-of-home displays as the answer to consumers\u2019 \u201cinsatiable desire for connectedness\u201d and the shift from a \u201c\u2019lean back\u2019 TV experience to a more active \u2018lean forward\u2019\u201d one. Traditional narrowcast displays, like those found in Wal-Mart or other retail stores, have been vehicles for open loop advertisements that do not respond to users or incorporate user-generated content. Wiffiti works by having a display in a public place, like a caf\u00e9 or club, to which users can send text messages that will be immediately displayed on screen. A particular establishment can extend the effectiveness of the device by prompting the audience to, say, submit music requests, vote on their favorite bartender, or answer trivia questions. The model for this is shown below:<\/p>\n

\"Public
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

Marketers love this idea and view it as the new way to connect with potential customers. The Economist reports<\/a> that Proctor & Gamble ran a promotion inviting women to text \u201csecrets\u201d to giant screen in Times Square that would also be broadcast on the secret.com website. (A representative message confessed, \u201cI cut my sister’s hair when she was younger and told my parents that she did it herself.\u201d) Executives at the company praised the promotion for dramatically increasing brand awareness.<\/p>\n

Public text messaging appeals not only to the need for connectedness that some of us have, but also to marketers and the owners of a venue because of the inherent data collection ability. A user\u2019s cell phone number acts as a unique identifier (like a cookie on a website) that can track the screens to which someone submits, what they actually said, and could possibly be combined with other databases of personal information. Of course, the availability of those other databases depends on the data sharing policies of companies with which one engages in business. Unfortunately, most people never read the fine print when they sign up for rewards cards at retail stores or other promotions. If the store has a lax data sharing policy and collected your cell phone number when you signed up, then the club or caf\u00e9 across town might be able to associate you with previous purchases and be able to target advertisements, offers, or anything else in your direction.<\/p>\n

But advertising companies are treading carefully; the trust of a consumer is of extremely high value and firms are anxious to preserve that. The founder of LocaModa notes that \u201cthe future of out-of-home screen media is unlikely to follow [an] Orwellian model.\u201d<\/p>\n

An important question about this technology is whether or not it helps the social nature of the location. Some would say that the last thing we need is another excuse to pull out a cell phone in a caf\u00e9 or club. In my own experience, it is common for digital natives to be in a social, public space and message friends that aren\u2019t present. During the time it takes to communicate, the DN displaces him or herself from the environment they are in. They are temporarily closer to the recipient of the message, miles away, than other people just a few feet apart from them. (For more on this, see Sherry Turkle\u2019s excellent piece, Always-on\/Always-on-you: The Tethered Self<\/a><\/em>.) Proponents of social graffiti spaces say this is just the opposite; it is immersive in the way it connects an individual to the people in the same space.<\/p>\n

What do you think about social texting? Would you engage in it at a caf\u00e9 or club? Do you think it helps or hurts the real life social relations between people?<\/p>\n

– Tony P.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

There was a great article in the Boston Globe yesterday about two Boston area companies, Aerva Inc. and LocaModa Inc., that are pioneering so-called \u201cpublic graffiti spaces.\u201d In essence, they are connected displays that show content submitted via text messages. It is also broadcast online so that others can tune in to a given location […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1637,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1071,117,1175,279],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-47","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-creativity","category-identity","category-information-overload","category-privacy"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/digitalnatives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/digitalnatives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/digitalnatives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/digitalnatives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1637"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/digitalnatives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/digitalnatives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/digitalnatives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/digitalnatives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=47"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/digitalnatives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=47"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}