{"id":63,"date":"2008-10-29T05:11:51","date_gmt":"2008-10-29T09:11:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/?page_id=63"},"modified":"2009-01-06T09:05:44","modified_gmt":"2009-01-06T13:05:44","slug":"docket","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/riaa\/docket\/","title":{"rendered":"Docket"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This page is a repository of all of the court filings associated with the RIAA v. Tenenbaum case. Under U.S. law, all court filings not under seal are a matter of public record, and are free to redistribute. Please feel free to peruse them, link to them, and make use of them in whatever way you please.<\/p>\n<p><strong>N.B.:<\/strong> The files for this case appear under a variety of civil dockets. To tell which docket a filing comes from, notice our convention.:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>No prefix:<\/strong> <i>Capital Records, Inc. et al v. Alaujan<\/i>, civil docket number <strong>1:03-cv-11661-NG<\/strong> in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Massachusetts (lead docket; consolidated docket for Joel&#8217;s case)<\/li>\n<li><strong>J-:<\/strong> <i>Sony BMG Music Entertainment et al v. Tenenbaum<\/i>, civil docket number <strong>1:07-cv-11446-NG<\/strong> in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Massachusetts (original docket for Joel&#8217;s case, consolidated into the above)<\/li>\n<li><strong>T-:<\/strong> <i>Sony BMG Music Entertainment et al v. Tenenbaum<\/i>, civil docket number <strong>2:08-mc-00312-DWA<\/strong> in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (docket opened by Plaintiffs to subpoena Joel&#8217;s sister Tova)<\/li>\n<li><strong>AJ-:<\/strong> <i>Sony BMG Music Entertainment et al v. Tenenbaum<\/i>, civil docket number <strong>1:08-mc-00104-T-LDA<\/strong> in the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island (docket opened by Plaintiffs to subpoena Joel&#8217;s parents)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h1><a name=\"complaint\">Complaint<\/a><\/h1>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Plaintiffs<\/strong>: Complaint against Joel Tenenbaum. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/j-01-1.pdf\">J-01<\/a>, 2007-08-07)\n<ul>\n<li>Exhibit A: MediaSentry report identifying 7 songs Plaintiffs believe infringed. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/j-01-2.pdf\">J-01-2<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Exhibits B-1 through B-7: MediaSentry screencaps allegedly showing the contents of Joel&#8217;s shared folder on KaZaA. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/j-01-3.pdf\">J-01-3<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/j-01-4.pdf\">-4<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/j-01-5.pdf\">-5<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/j-01-6.pdf\">-6<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/j-01-7.pdf\">-7<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/j-01-8.pdf\">-8<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/j-01-9.pdf\">-9<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Plaintiffs<\/strong>: Corporate disclosure statement. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/j-02.pdf\">J-02<\/a>, 2007-08-07)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Plaintiffs<\/strong>: Civil action cover sheet. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/j-03.pdf\">J-03<\/a>, 2007-08-07)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Court<\/strong>: Summons to Joel to appear in court. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/j-04.pdf\">J-04<\/a>, 2007-08-07)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h1><a name=\"answer\">Answer<\/a><\/h1>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Answer to Complaint. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/j-05.pdf\">J-05<\/a>, 2007-09-24)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Motion to Amend Answer. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/484.pdf\">484<\/a>, 2007-12-07)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Plaintiffs:<\/strong> Motion for Extension of Time to reply. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/489-1.pdf\">489-1<\/a>, 2007-12-11)\n<ul>\n<li>Exhibit A: Text of proposed order allowing extension of time. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/489-1.pdf\">489-2<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Response to Motion for Extension of Time. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/494-2.pdf\">494<\/a>, 2007-12-20)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Court:<\/strong> Granted Plaintiffs&#8217; Motion for Extension of Time. (2008-01-04)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Plaintiffs:<\/strong> Response in Opposition to Joel&#8217;s Motion to Amend Answer. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/495-1.pdf\">495-1<\/a>, 2008-01-03)\n<ul>\n<li>Exhibit A: U.S. District Court for the District of Central California order. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/495-2.pdf\">495-2<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs&#8217; Opposition to Joel&#8217;s Motion to Amend Answer. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/508.pdf\">508<\/a>, 2008-01-22)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Court:<\/strong> Granted Joel&#8217;s Motion to Amend Answer. (2008-06-18)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Amended Answer with Counterclaim. For action over Joel&#8217;s counterclaim, go <a href=\"#counterclaimjoinder\">here<\/a>. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/625.pdf\">625<\/a>, 2008-08-20)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h1><a name=\"consolidation\">Consolidation<\/a><\/h1>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Court:<\/strong> Order consolidating case in a different docket. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/j-06.pdf\">J-06<\/a>, 2007-09-26)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h1><a name=\"summaryjudgment\">Joel&#8217;s Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment<\/a><\/h1>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Motion to Dismiss Complaint and for Summary Judgment. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/486.pdf\">486<\/a>, 2007-12-07)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Plaintiffs:<\/strong> Motion for Extension of Time to reply. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/489-1.pdf\">489-1<\/a>, 2007-12-11)\n<ul>\n<li>Exhibit A: Text of proposed order allowing extension of time. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/489-1.pdf\">489-2<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Plaintiffs:<\/strong> Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/496-1.pdf\">496-1<\/a>, 2008-01-03)\n<ul>\n<li>Exhibit A: U.S. District Court for the District of Central California order denying  Defendant&#8217;s Motion to Dismiss . (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/496-2.pdf\">496-2<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Exhibit B: U.S. District Court for the District of Northern Texas order denying Defendant&#8217;s Motion to Dismiss . (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/496-3.pdf\">496-3<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Exhibit C: U.S. District Court for the District of Northern Texas filing in which Plaintiffs recommend denying Defendant&#8217;s Motion to Dismiss . (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/496-4.pdf\">496-4<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Exhibit D: U.S. District Court for the District of Northern California order granting Plaintiffs&#8217; Motion for Summary Judgment . (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/496-5.pdf\">496-5<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Exhibit E: U.S. District Court for the District of Southern California order granting Plaintiffs&#8217; Motion for Default Judgment . (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/496-6.pdf\">496-6<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Exhibit F: U.S. District Court for the District of Southern California order entering a Default Judgment . (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/496-7.pdf\">496-7<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Exhibit G: Letter from Register of Copyrights supporting &#8220;Making Available&#8221; as infringement (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/496-8.pdf\">496-8<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Exhibit H: Jury instruction supporting &#8220;Making Available&#8221; as infringement (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/496-9.pdf\">496-9<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Plaintiffs:<\/strong> Cross-motion for Continuance and Opposition to Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/497-1.pdf\">497-1<\/a>, 2008-01-03)\n<ul>\n<li>Exhibit A: MediaSentry affidavit. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/497-2.pdf\">497-2<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Exhibit C: Attorney Laurie Rust&#8217;s affidavit. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/497-3.pdf\">497-3<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Exhibit D: John Doe #45 ISP record. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/497-4.pdf\">497-4<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Exhibit E: U.S. District Court for the District of Northern Texas order denying Defendants&#8217; Motions to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment . (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/497-5.pdf\">497-5<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Exhibit F: U.S. District Court for the District of Western Texas order  denying Defendants&#8217; Motions to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/497-6.pdf\">497-6<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Exhibits B-1 through B-4: MediaSentry screenshots of Joel&#8217;s alleged shared folder. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/497-7.pdf\">497-7<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/497-8.pdf\">-8<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/497-8.pdf\">-9<\/a>, added 2007-01-08)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Opposition to Plaintiffs&#8217; Opposition to Motion to Dismiss. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/507.pdf\">507<\/a>, 2008-01-22)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Reply to Plaintiffs&#8217; Opposition to Motion to Dismiss. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/510.pdf\">510<\/a>, 2008-01-22)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Court:<\/strong> Denied Joel&#8217;s Motion to Dismiss, Mooted Plaintiffs&#8217;s Cross-Motion for Continuance. (2008-01-29)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h1><a name=\"sanctions\">Joel&#8217;s Motion for Sanctions<\/a><\/h1>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Motion for Sanctions. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/480.pdf\">480<\/a>, 2007-12-05)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Plaintiffs:<\/strong> Opposition to Motion for Sanctions. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/492-1.pdf\">492-1<\/a>, 2007-12-19)\n<ul>\n<li>Exhibit A: Affidavit of Attorney Laurie Rust. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/492-2.pdf\">489-2<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Motion for Sanctions under FRCP Rule 11(b). (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/505.pdf\">505<\/a>, 2008-01-22)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Affidavit in Support of Motion for Sanctions under FRCP Rule 11(b). (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/506.pdf\">506<\/a>, 2008-01-22)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Reply in Opposition to Plaintiffs&#8217; Opposition to Motion for Sanctions. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/509-1.pdf\">509-1<\/a>, 2008-01-22)\n<ul>\n<li>Exhibit A: Evidence of average suit settlement amount. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/509-2.pdf\">509-2<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Court<\/strong>: Denied Motion for Sanctions. (2008-01-29)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Court<\/strong>: Denied Motion for Sanctions under FRCP Rule 11(b). (2008-01-29)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h1><a name=\"lawyersearch\">Joel&#8217;s Search for a Lawyer<\/a><\/h1>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Letter to Court regarding appointment of counsel.  (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/525.pdf\">525<\/a>, 2008-02-14)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Letter to Court regarding appointment of counsel.  (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/530.pdf\">530<\/a>, 2008-02-29)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Court:<\/strong> Transcript of June 17 status hearing in which Joel&#8217;s search for counsel is addressed.  (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/614.pdf\">614<\/a>, 2008-07-30)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Notice of Appearance of Charles Nesson as Joel&#8217;s counsel. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/659.pdf\">659<\/a>, 2008-09-22)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Court:<\/strong> Notice to Charles Nesson of mandatory use of electronic filing. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/673.pdf\">673<\/a>, 2008-10-17)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h1><a name=\"disputeresolution\">Dispute Resolution<\/a><\/h1>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Court:<\/strong> Transcript of June 17 status hearing in which Joel and plaintiffs agree to try alternative dispute resolution.  (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/614.pdf\">614<\/a>, 2008-07-30)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Court:<\/strong> Order referring case to alternative dispute resolution.  (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/577.pdf\">577<\/a>, 2008-06-23)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Plaintiffs:<\/strong> Motion to continue mediation, unopposed by Joel.  (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/588.pdf\">588<\/a>, 2008-07-03)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Letter to Court requesting cancellation of mediation.  (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/616.pdf\">616<\/a>, 2008-07-29)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Plaintiffs:<\/strong> Letter to Court opposing Joel&#8217;s cancellation request.  (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/622.pdf\">622<\/a>, 2008-08-07)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h1><a name=\"counterclaimjoinder\">Counterclaims and Joining the RIAA<\/a><\/h1>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Amended Answer with Counterclaim. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/625.pdf\">625<\/a>, 2008-08-20)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Plaintiffs:<\/strong> Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/670-1.pdf\">670-1<\/a>, 2008-10-02)\n<ul>\n<li>Exhibits A-C: Various U.S. District Court cases in support. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/670-2.pdf\">670-2<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Amended Counterclaim. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/675.pdf\">675<\/a>, 2008-10-27)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs&#8217; Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/676.pdf\">676<\/a>, 2008-10-27)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Motion to Join the RIAA as a Counterclaim Defendant under FRCP Rules 19 and 20. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/677.pdf\">677<\/a>, 2008-10-27)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Motion for Leave to Amend Counterclaim. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/12\/686-1.pdf\">686-1<\/a>, 2008-11-05)\n<ul>\n<li>Exhibit A: Proposed amendment. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/686-2.pdf\">686-2<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Plaintiffs:<\/strong>Motion for Leave to file a reply to Joel&#8217;s opposition to dismiss counterclaim, and in support of motion to dismiss counterclaims. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/684.pdf\">684<\/a>, 2008-11-10)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Plaintiffs:<\/strong> Motion to Strike Motion to Join the RIAA. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/687-1.pdf\">687-1<\/a>, 2008-11-12)\n<ul>\n<li>Exhibit A: Affidavit by Attorney Eve Burton in suppport. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/687-2.pdf\">687-2<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Exhibits A-D: Exhibits for Exhibit A. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/687-3.pdf\">687-3<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Court:<\/strong> Granted Plaintiffs&#8217; Motion for Leave to file a reply. (2008-11-14)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Plaintiffs:<\/strong> Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/691.pdf\">691<\/a>, 2008-11-14)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Motion to Join the RIAA as a Counterclaim Defendant. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/693.pdf\">693<\/a>, 2008-11-14)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Court:<\/strong> Mooted Motion to Join the RIAA under FRCP Rules 19 and 20; mooted Motion to Strike Motion to Join the RIAA under FRCP Rules 19 and 20. (2008-11-18)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Notice of Constitutional Question. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/695.pdf\">695<\/a>, 2008-11-18)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Court:<\/strong> A hearing will be held on outstanding motions of this type at a status conference on 2008-01-22 at 2:30 pm.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Plaintiffs<\/strong>: Opposition to Joel&#8217;s Motion for Leave to Amend Counterclaim (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/703-1.pdf\">703-1<\/a>, 2008-11-24)\n<ul>\n<li>Exhibit A: Excerpts from transcript of September 23, 2008 hearing. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/703-2.pdf\">703-2<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Exhibit B: Eastern District of Missouri order dismissing counterclaims. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/703-3.pdf\">703-3<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Exhibit C: District of Minnesota memorandum defending the Copyright Act&#8217;s constitutionality of statutory damages. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/703-4.pdf\">703-4<\/a>)<\/li>\n<li>Exhibit D: Central District of California order denying motion for judgment notwithstanding verdict. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/703-5.pdf\">703-5<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Plaintiffs:<\/strong> Opposition to Joel&#8217;s Motion to Add the RIAA as a Counterclaim Defendant (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/704-1.pdf\">704-1<\/a>, 2008-11-28)\n<ul>\n<li>Exhibit A: Excerpts from transcript of September 23, 2008 hearing. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/704-2.pdf\">704-2<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Plaintiffs:<\/strong> Correction to Opposition to Joel&#8217;s Motion to Add the RIAA as a Counterclaim Defendant (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/706-1.pdf\">706-1<\/a>, 2008-12-02)\n<ul>\n<li>Exhibit A: Amended Exhibit D. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/706-2.pdf\">706-2<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h1><a name=\"discovery\">Discovery<\/a><\/h1>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Court:<\/strong> Procedural Order regarding discovery. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/513.pdf\">513<\/a>, 2008-01-03)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Court:<\/strong> Amended Procedural Order regarding discovery. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/521.pdf\">521<\/a>, 2008-02-06)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Letter to Court regarding his deposition, missed due to illness. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/646.pdf\">646<\/a>, 2008-09-02)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Letter to Court regarding rescheduling depositions. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/647.pdf\">647<\/a>, 2008-09-03)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Letter to Court regarding his deposition. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/648.pdf\">648<\/a>, 2008-09-05)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Copy of Letter from Joel to Attorney John Bauer regarding proposed dates for deposition (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/649.pdf\">649<\/a>, 2008-09-05)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Motion for Protective Order (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/672-1.pdf\">672-1<\/a>, 2008-10-15)\n<ul>\n<li>Exhibits A-C: Plaintiffs&#8217; Request for Inspection; Plaintiffs&#8217; Proposed Stipulation to Protective Order; Defendant&#8217;s Proposed Protective Order. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/672-2.pdf\">672-2<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Plaintiffs:<\/strong> Opposition to Motion for Protective Order (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/682-1.pdf\">682-1<\/a>, 2008-10-30)\n<ul>\n<li>Exhibits A-H: Proposed Stipulation to Protective Order; Declaration of Eve Burton; United States District Court for the District of Western Texas Order; Supplemental Disclosure Statement; Declaration of Doug Jacobson; Modifications of Admissions; First Set of Interrogatories (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2008\/11\/682-2.pdf\">682-2<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h1><a name=\"arthurjudie\">Protecting Joel&#8217;s Parents&#8217; Computer<\/a><\/h1>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Plaintiffs:<\/strong> Emergency motion to compel response to subpoena. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2009\/01\/aj-01-1.pdf\">1-1<\/a>, 2008-11-13)<\/li>\n<ul>\n<li>Exhibit A: Relevant documents from case in Massachusetts. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2009\/01\/aj-01-2.pdf\">1-2<\/a>)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<li><strong>Court:<\/strong> Notice of hearing on December 1. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2009\/01\/aj-02.pdf\">2<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2009\/01\/aj-03.pdf\">3<\/a>, 2008-11-14)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Plaintiffs:<\/strong> Notice of <em>rescheduled<\/em> hearing on December 15. (Joel was not informed by Plaintiffs of the Dec. 1 hearing.) (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2009\/01\/aj-04.pdf\">4<\/a>, 2008-11-14)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Court:<\/strong> At the December 15 hearing, neither our nor Plaintiffs&#8217; counsel could be admitted to appear in the court due to paperwork mistakes. Plaintiffs&#8217; motion (through local counsel) to &#8216;preserve&#8217; the computer was denied. Hearing rescheduled for January 6 at 2 pm. (2008-12-15)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Plaintiffs:<\/strong> Motion for Boston counsel&#8217;s appearance <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pro_hac_vice\">pro hac vice<\/a>. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2009\/01\/aj-06.pdf\">6<\/a>, 2008-12-15)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Notice of local counsel&#8217;s appearance. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2009\/01\/aj-08.pdf\">8<\/a>, 2008-12-15)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Motion for Charles Nesson&#8217;s appearance <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pro_hac_vice\">pro hac vice<\/a>. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2009\/01\/aj-09.pdf\">9<\/a>, 2008-12-24)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Opposition to Plaintiffs&#8217; emergency motion to compel response to subpoena . (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2009\/01\/aj-11.pdf\">11<\/a>, 2009-01-02)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Joel:<\/strong> Judie Tenenbaum&#8217;s affidavit in support of Joel&#8217;s opposition. (<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/files\/2009\/01\/aj-12.pdf\">12<\/a>, 2009-01-02)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Court:<\/strong> Plaintiffs&#8217; and Joel&#8217;s counsel are admitted to practice. (2009-01-05)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This page is a repository of all of the court filings associated with the RIAA v. Tenenbaum case. Under U.S. law, all court filings not under seal are a matter of public record, and are free to redistribute. Please feel free to peruse them, link to them, and make use of them in whatever way [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":394,"featured_media":0,"parent":59,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-63","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/63","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/394"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=63"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/63\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/59"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cyberone\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=63"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}