This post brought to you via Xfce and Xubuntu.
Category Archives: open source
Smackdown, finally: Novell owns Unix
In throwing out SCO’s claim that it owns the copyrights to Unix, the judge essentially eviscerated the whole ridiculous case, including the charges against IBM and others. It makes for sweet reading, and Joe LaSala got a nice quote in the John Markoff article in the Times today: “The court’s ruling has cut out the core of SCO’s case and, as a result, eliminates SCO’s threat to the Linux community based upon allegations of copyright infringement of Unix,” said Joe LaSala, Novell’s senior vice president and general counsel.
Linux kernel development
From Novell’s own Greg Kroah-Hartman, a presentation on Linux Kernel Development [pdf], subtitled “How, What, How Fast, and Who.” It’s full of juicy information, including this breakdown of contributors:
- Unknown Individuals 33.2%
- Red Hat 11.8%
- Novell 9.7%
- Linux Foundation 8.1%
- IBM 7.9%
- Intel 4.3%
- “Amateurs” 3.9%
- SGI 2.2%
- MIPS 1.5%
- HP 1.3%
Of course, this raises as many questions as it answers; who are these unknown indviduals who contribute fully a third of the changes to the Linux kernel?
Indiana:Solaris::OpenSUSE:SLES::Fedora:RHEL
From Glynn Foster of Sun, an entertaining presentation [.pdf] on “Project Indiana”, delivered at a meeting of the Irish OpenSolaris Users Group. Tim Foster has more.
Kids today: The Online Desktop
From GUADEC, a presentation [.pdf] by Bryan Clark and Havoc Pennington of Red Hat on a proposed direction for Gnome, “The Online Desktop.” The proposal is, as I understand, to acknowledge the central place of the internet for the desktop computing experience and to treat your local environment more and more as a client for the server-in-the-cloud. Your bookmarks are Del.icio.us, your photo “app” is Flickr, your mapping software is Google Maps, and so forth. This idea, not so new to the graybeards whose eyes are rolling violently back and forth in their old heads, is interesting for several reasons:
- the mix of open and closed source; open on the desktop side, not so open on the server cloud side. But with easy APIs, does it really matter to end users?
- the requirement for an always-on network connection
- the promise of kiosk computing
- ease of maintenance; you don’t do it, essentially — the services do
- the shift from an imitation of Windows (or Mac or Xerox Parc…) to an actually new, innovative approach available only on Linux
A bit more on what I believe is the empty promise of kiosk computing:
The idea behind this is always described by a use case of a random person walking up to a random computer and through {magic, our product, the Online Desktop, whatever}, all of their preferences and files automatically appear in front of them. Whether or not this is technically possible is not the point; I’ve worked on several projects where we’ve done something almost exactly like this. The question really ought to be: does this use case exist? I think that, outside of a few specialized instances, it does not. Those specialized instances include college campuses, hospitals, and perhaps shop (i.e., factory) floors. And even in those instances, kiosks and these users aren’t all that common. I was at a major teaching hospital today in Los Angeles where physicians and nurses tote laptops into exam rooms. In other hospital settings, the shared workstation is still common, but it’s certainly not the only approach. Kiosks also exist on college campuses, but what percentage of college students today don’t have their own computers? The truth is, people like to own their own hardware. Perhaps in poor countries, the appeal of having your own LiveCD with an Online Desktop of your own running on a shared workstation will subsitute for hardware ownership?
