{"id":3291,"date":"2003-07-25T01:11:04","date_gmt":"2003-07-25T05:11:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cmusings\/2003\/07\/25\/hm\/"},"modified":"2003-07-25T01:11:04","modified_gmt":"2003-07-25T05:11:04","slug":"hm","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cmusings\/2003\/07\/25\/hm\/","title":{"rendered":"Hm"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a276'><\/a><\/p>\n<p><P>To figure <A href=\"http:\/\/www.pbs.org\/cringely\/pulpit\/pulpit20030724.html\">this<\/A> out, I&#8217;ll meditate on mutual funds while you grep for group ownership of sound recordings.<\/P><br \/>\n<P><STRONG>[added:] <\/STRONG>Although, it&#8217;d probably be better to start by figuring out some more pertinent issues, like the ones&nbsp;<A href=\"http:\/\/msl1.mit.edu\/furdlog\/index.php?wl_mode=more&amp;wl_eid=371\">Frank points out<\/A>.&nbsp;Cringely says, &#8220;Each share also carries the right to download backup or media-shifting copies for $0.05 per song or $0.50 per CD.&#8221; It does?&nbsp; If you have to pay to make the back-up copy, that might change the fair use analysis.&nbsp; Group ownership of a recording (even if it works like Cringely says it does)&nbsp;probably does&nbsp;not&nbsp;include making back-ups for each member of the group.&nbsp; Having one copy does not mean you can make infinite simultaneous uses.<\/P><br \/>\n<P>In fact, there&#8217;s an appeals&nbsp;case that&#8217;s quite applicable here: <A href=\"http:\/\/www.arl.org\/info\/frn\/copy\/texaco.html\">American Geophyiscal Union v. Texaco.<\/A>&nbsp; A Texaco scientist made personal&nbsp;copies of particular articles within a scientific journal purchased by Texaco. Everybody was working under the same roof, but it wasn&#8217;t a fair use.&nbsp;&nbsp;The fact that&nbsp;Texaco is for-profit played a&nbsp;slight role compared to the court&#8217;s construal of the market impact &#8211; the journal was losing traditional potential licensing revenues.&nbsp; Where have we heard that before? The <A href=\"http:\/\/www.tomwbell.com\/NetLaw\/Ch07\/UMG.html\">MP3.com<\/A> case<EM>.<\/EM><\/P><br \/>\n<P>There are certainly grounds to disagree with both cases.&nbsp;<EM>Sony<\/EM>&#8216;s treatment of the potential market seems pretty different.&nbsp; The Court scrutinized the copyright holder&#8217;s discussion of market damage. In these other cases, there wasn&#8217;t a heck of a lot of proof of damages and the courts didn&#8217;t really burden the copyright holders.&nbsp; The difference, I suppose, is the first factor, the fact that it was commercial use, though the judge in <EM>MP3.com<\/EM> didn&#8217;t really emphasize this.(I think it&#8217;s time to read the fair use after <EM>Sony <\/EM>article that I found. I&#8217;ll have something on that a little later.)<\/P><br \/>\n<P>One last question: regardless of whether Cringely&#8217;s scheme would work, do you think most people look at&nbsp;it the same way they look at Fisher&#8217;s scheme? If not, for the average person, which one&#8217;s the dream scheme and which one&#8217;s the plausible plan?&nbsp; <\/P><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>To figure this out, I&#8217;ll meditate on mutual funds while you grep for group ownership of sound recordings. [added:] Although, it&#8217;d probably be better to start by figuring out some more pertinent issues, like the ones&nbsp;Frank points out.&nbsp;Cringely says, &#8220;Each share also carries the right to download backup or media-shifting copies for $0.05 per song [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":72,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[85],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3291","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-big-ideas"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cmusings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3291","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cmusings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cmusings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cmusings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/72"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cmusings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3291"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cmusings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3291\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cmusings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3291"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cmusings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3291"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cmusings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3291"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}