{"id":3047,"date":"2005-09-21T19:05:48","date_gmt":"2005-09-21T23:05:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cmusings\/2005\/09\/21\/shocking-making-all-the-google-print"},"modified":"2005-09-21T19:05:48","modified_gmt":"2005-09-21T23:05:48","slug":"shocking-making-all-the-google-print-facts-clear-really-does-make-a","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cmusings\/2005\/09\/21\/shocking-making-all-the-google-print-facts-clear-really-does-make-a\/","title":{"rendered":"Shocking: Making All The Google Print Facts Clear Really Does Make a Difference"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a1396'><\/a><\/p>\n<p>So many people (including, unfortunately, <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cmusings\/2005\/08\/19#a1285\">myself<\/a><br \/>\nat times) have misreported precisely what Google Print does with books<br \/>\nnot in the Publisher Program.&nbsp; When people know what the Authors<br \/>\nGuild is really claiming, I&#8217;d bet many of the most sincere copyright<br \/>\nmaximalists\/neoclassicists\/physical-property-equivalence-makers would<br \/>\nagree that Google&#8217;s in the right.<\/p>\n<p>Case in point: <a href=\"http:\/\/weblog.ipcentral.info\/archives\/2005\/09\/google_responds.html\">James Delong.<\/a><\/p>\n<div style=\"margin-left: 40px;\">&#8220;To show only the limited info described by Google would, IMHO, pretty<br \/>\nclearly be a fair use. So the authors must be objecting to the fact<br \/>\nthat an entire book is being copied without permission, even if it is<br \/>\nthen hidden in an electronic vault. But what is the objection, if only<br \/>\nsnippets are shown? Is it a fear of Napsterization &#8212; that once the<br \/>\ndigital copy is made it could escape into the world? <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Or is it simply a<br \/>\nnaked assertion of right &#8212; &#8220;copyright law says no copying, so you must<br \/>\npay me to do it, even if it would actually be in my interest to have<br \/>\nsnippets made available.&#8221;&#8221; (emphasis added)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>Well put, James.&nbsp; He ultimately believes that &#8220;Google might well<br \/>\nwin a decision&#8221; because their intermediate copying reduces transaction<br \/>\ncosts. I&#8217;m not sure I agree on that narrow view of the fair use<br \/>\ninterest, but I think I share his basic sentiment.&nbsp; This isn&#8217;t<br \/>\nabout Napsterization, this isn&#8217;t about <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nyu.edu\/classes\/siva\/archives\/001841.html\">&#8220;copyright nihilism&#8221;<\/a> &#8211; it&#8217;s a case of copyright holders&#8217; overreaching in ways that go against the public&#8217;s interests.<\/p>\n<p>See also, EFF&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.eff.org\/news\/archives\/2005_09.php#003994\">press release<\/a> today, pointing to Jonathan Band&#8217;s informative <a href=\"http:\/\/www.policybandwidth.com\/doc\/googleprint.pdf\">legal analysis.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So many people (including, unfortunately, myself at times) have misreported precisely what Google Print does with books not in the Publisher Program.&nbsp; When people know what the Authors Guild is really claiming, I&#8217;d bet many of the most sincere copyright maximalists\/neoclassicists\/physical-property-equivalence-makers would agree that Google&#8217;s in the right. Case in point: James Delong. &#8220;To show [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":72,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[84],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3047","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cmusings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3047","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cmusings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cmusings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cmusings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/72"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cmusings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3047"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cmusings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3047\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cmusings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3047"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cmusings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3047"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cmusings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3047"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}