{"id":4148,"date":"2005-04-27T14:30:07","date_gmt":"2005-04-27T18:30:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/httpblogslawharvardeduceerock4\/2005\/04\/27\/iffboston-awar"},"modified":"2006-12-23T12:29:31","modified_gmt":"2006-12-23T16:29:31","slug":"iffboston-awards","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ceerock\/2005\/04\/27\/iffboston-awards\/","title":{"rendered":"IFFBoston Awards"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name=\"a3145\"><\/a>Apparently my priorities were very different from the other <a href=\"http:\/\/iffboston.org\/index.html\">IFFBoston<\/a> audience members as well as the Grand Jury for the festival, as I managed to miss every single one of the winners for both Jury and Audience awards. I therefore cannot give you my own commentary on the winners, so I will instead tell you why I missed each and give my own alternate winner:<\/p>\n<p>Grand Jury and Special Jury Award Prizes<\/p>\n<p>Narrative Feature: <a href=\"http:\/\/iffboston.org\/2005\/film_blackballed.html\">BLACKBALLED: THE BOBBY DUKES STORY<\/a>, directed by Brant Sersen. This is a mockumentary and therefore I question its placement in the narrative feature category. And I did plan to see it but I chose instead to see some real documentaries. I was flying high on idealism after seeing <span style=\"font-style: italic\"><a href=\"http:\/\/iffboston.org\/2005\/film_chain.html\">Chain<\/a> <\/span>and <span style=\"font-style: italic\"><a href=\"http:\/\/iffboston.org\/2005\/film_mutualappreciation.html\">Mutual Appreciation<\/a><\/span> and didn&#8217;t want to spoil the ride with silly cynical Comedy-Central comedy about Paintball players. And I want to know who the hell is on this Grand Jury if they picked <em>this<\/em> as the best film. I did manage to catch <a href=\"http:\/\/iffboston.org\/2005\/film_filmic.html\">Filmic Achievement<\/a>, another mockumentary, but was not impressed. It takes a very subtle hand to make an effective mockumentary&#8211;a little too much of one thing or another and you just look like a bad imitation of <em>Spinal Tap<\/em> or <em>The Office<\/em>. And <em>Filmic Achievement<\/em>, a mockumentary about film students, looked like that. MY SELECTION FOR THE AWARD: Andrew Bujalski&#8217;s <em><a href=\"http:\/\/iffboston.org\/2005\/film_mutualappreciation.html\">Mutual Appreciation<\/a><\/em>, natch.<\/p>\n<p>Best documentary: Ellen Perry for <a href=\"http:\/\/iffboston.org\/2005\/film_fujimori.html\">THE FALL OF FUJIMORI<\/a>. I did also plan to see this one but couldn&#8217;t due to time conflicts. It is not possible to see all films in a film festival, unfortunately. I could&#8217;ve made time, but there are very difficult decisions to be made when you are trying to see as much as you can at a festival. Sigh. Such sacrifices we make. MY SELECTION FOR THE AWARD: I didn&#8217;t see enough docs in the festival to really have an authoritative opinion, and of those I did see I wasn&#8217;t bowled over by any, so I would have to go with <em><a href=\"http:\/\/iffboston.org\/2005\/film_futurefood.html\">The Future of Food<\/a><\/em>, which I suppose you could say did bowl me over&#8211;with horror at our government and corporate greed. But if you allow <em>Chain<\/em> into the documentary category, that would definitely be my choice. It doesn&#8217;t really fit into doc or fiction categories, though.<\/p>\n<p>Audience Awards<\/p>\n<p>Narrative feature: <a href=\"http:\/\/iffboston.org\/2005\/film_brothers.html\">BROTHERS<\/a>, directed by Susanne Bier.  This was a late addition to the schedule and only had one screening, which I learned of too late, and I don&#8217;t really understand how a film can get that many votes from a single screening. It&#8217;s not something that I probably would&#8217;ve wanted to see anyway, though, and I suspect it got its votes because it is a dramatic and timely war film.<\/p>\n<p>Documentary feature: <a href=\"http:\/\/iffboston.org\/2005\/film_afterinnocence.html\">AFTER INNOCENCE<\/a>, directed by Jessica Sanders.  Another that I was only mildly interested in. The docs in the festival seemed very straightforward and while generally I am more interested in documentary, I am not usually in it for the actual subject matter. If that&#8217;s all you want in a documentary, it becomes merely a matter of somebody finding the best\/weirdest story. It&#8217;s then about journalism, not about filmmaking. The docs I did see (<a href=\"http:\/\/iffboston.org\/2005\/film_futurefood.html\"><em>Future of Food<\/em><\/a><em>, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/iffboston.org\/2005\/film_rhythm.html\"><em>Rhythm Is It<\/em><\/a><em>, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/iffboston.org\/2005\/film_spew.html\"><em>Spew<\/em><\/a><em>,<\/em> and <em><a href=\"http:\/\/iffboston.org\/2005\/film_insideout.html\">Inside Out<\/a><\/em>) were all in this vein. <em>Rhythm Is It<\/em>, which is about a troupe of troubled teenagers who were wrangled together to put on a dance performance in Berlin, was perhaps the only one that tried to say more than its subject matter. But in a fairly didactic way, which to me undermines the artistry. And I didn&#8217;t see anything in the doc lineup at the festival that attempted much in the way of artistry. I could be wrong, of course, as there were a dozen or so that I didn&#8217;t see. But I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m wrong.<\/p>\n<p>In sum, I don&#8217;t think much of these award winners, neither the Grand Jury nor Audience Awards. Pfft.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Apparently my priorities were very different from the other IFFBoston audience members as well as the Grand Jury for the festival, as I managed to miss every single one of the winners for both Jury and Audience awards. I therefore cannot give you my own commentary on the winners, so I will instead tell you [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":92,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1228,41],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4148","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-iffboston","category-just-movies"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p58QoK-14U","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ceerock\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4148","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ceerock\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ceerock\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ceerock\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/92"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ceerock\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4148"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ceerock\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4148\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ceerock\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4148"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ceerock\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4148"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ceerock\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4148"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}