{"id":247,"date":"2010-03-30T19:52:49","date_gmt":"2010-03-30T23:52:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/cbracy\/?p=247"},"modified":"2010-03-30T21:29:46","modified_gmt":"2010-03-31T01:29:46","slug":"the-non-profit-news-straw-man","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cbracy\/2010\/03\/30\/the-non-profit-news-straw-man\/","title":{"rendered":"The Non-Profit News Straw Man"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I know, I know.\u00a0 This is a tired conversation.\u00a0 But my friend <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/jsb\">John Bracken<\/a> tweeted a link to <a href=\"http:\/\/newsosaur.blogspot.com\/2010\/03\/non-profits-cant-possibly-save-news.html\">a post on Alan Mutter&#8217;s blog bashing the idea<\/a> that non-profit business models would save journalism.\u00a0 While he&#8217;s probably right, I had a couple of problems with his argument that ultimately helped shape what role I think money (or business models) plays in this conversation so I thought I&#8217;d address them:<\/p>\n<p>1) Why is it assumed that the cost of mainstream media is the cost of journalism?\u00a0 Mutter says: &#8220;The math, as detailed below, shows that it would take $88 billion \u2013 or  nearly a third of all the $307.7 billion donated to charity in 2008 \u2013 to  fund the reporting still being done at America\u2019s seriously straitened  newspapers&#8221; and &#8220;if you wanted to sustain the current level of newspaper coverage by  replacing for-profit funding with non-profit dollars, the typical  approach would be to raise an endowment that would be invested  conservatively to produce an annual return of 5%.&#8221;\u00a0 Um, who says we want to sustain the current level (or at least format) of newspaper coverage?\u00a0 And why would we want to do it so simplistically as to replace every for-profit dollar with a non-profit one?\u00a0 I think there are a lot of imaginative people out there who can envision running a <a href=\"http:\/\/globalvoicesonline.org\">viable news organization<\/a> on significantly less than what traditional media outlets spend today.\u00a0 I understand the argument that &#8220;it costs a lot of money to maintain a Baghdad (let alone Port au Prince) bureau&#8221; but many innovative outlets have shown that it&#8217;s at least possible to deliver meaningful, accurate, insightful news content without spending billions of dollars.\u00a0 So, it&#8217;s a small point, but it&#8217;s important to recognize that solving the problem isn&#8217;t (and shouldn&#8217;t be) about a one-to-one replacement of lost dollars from mainstream media outlets.<\/p>\n<p>2) I take issue with the way the term &#8220;non-profit&#8221; is used.\u00a0 It seems too narrow to me.\u00a0 I shouldn&#8217;t pick on Mutter because I see this in all corners of the debate, but non-profit doesn&#8217;t have to mean &#8220;publicly funded&#8221; or &#8220;only supported by charitable donations.&#8221;\u00a0 In my view, the failure of journalism derives from the fact that too many mainstream media organizations are capitalist operations.\u00a0 They&#8217;re publicly owned entities&#8211;usually a subsidiary of a larger conglomerate&#8211;that are producing a product in hopes of selling it to a market.\u00a0 They&#8217;re worried about increasing margins and shareholder returns, not practicing journalism.\u00a0 I mean, has anyone watched the Today Show lately?\u00a0 They&#8217;re in the business of selling.<\/p>\n<p>Forget funding for a second (I know, naive).\u00a0 If we agree that a free press (or independent news media, or whatever) is vital for the health of a democracy, then we should also believe that journalism organizations should be mission-driven: to provide information in the public interest, in such a way that promotes civic engagement and good governance.\u00a0 There&#8217;s no reason why an organization with that mission shouldn&#8217;t be able to have a business model that&#8217;s something other than &#8220;non-profit&#8221; (in the narrow sense of the term) without jumping all the way over to &#8220;cog in a capitalist machine.&#8221;\u00a0 Let&#8217;s use the New Yorker as an example.\u00a0 While their model (one rich guy who doesn&#8217;t mind losing a lot of money on a magazine) isn&#8217;t exactly sustainable, it gets to the point I&#8217;m trying to make: &#8220;for-profit&#8221; news outlets can be governed by something other than a desire for better margins.\u00a0 In order to endure, the New Yorker is going to have to find another way to support itself, but I don&#8217;t think it has to become The Today Show in order to do so.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m fully willing to recognize that I don&#8217;t know what the hell I&#8217;m talking about.\u00a0 God knows there have been umpteen discussions on this topic, among people who actually work in this field.\u00a0 I just think there needs to be a little more imagination (and maybe more focus on the mission rather than the product) when thinking about how journalism will be reconceived.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I know, I know.\u00a0 This is a tired conversation.\u00a0 But my friend John Bracken tweeted a link to a post on Alan Mutter&#8217;s blog bashing the idea that non-profit business models would save journalism.\u00a0 While he&#8217;s probably right, I had a couple of problems with his argument that ultimately helped shape what role I think [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2061,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-247","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cbracy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cbracy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cbracy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cbracy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2061"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cbracy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=247"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cbracy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":261,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cbracy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/247\/revisions\/261"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cbracy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=247"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cbracy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=247"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/cbracy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=247"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}