{"id":14,"date":"2005-02-03T14:03:09","date_gmt":"2005-02-03T18:03:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/anderkoo\/2005\/02\/03\/social-security-reform-robbing-paul-"},"modified":"2005-02-03T14:03:09","modified_gmt":"2005-02-03T18:03:09","slug":"social-security-reform-robbing-paul-to-pay-jona","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/anderkoo\/2005\/02\/social-security-reform-robbing-paul-to-pay-jona\/","title":{"rendered":"Social Security reform: robbing Paul to pay Jona"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a300'><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Bush&#8217;s Social Security rhetoric is squarely pitched at my<br \/>\ngeneration, prophesying 2042, when I will be 67, as the doomsday<br \/>\nyear when Social Security will finally go bust. And his quasi-privitization solution has some<br \/>\nappealing features, most of all the likelihood of doing more with less. But the <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">merits<\/span> of the plan, like most of Bush&#8217;s economic<br \/>\ninitiatives, favor Baby Boomers and leave us, their children, with the bill.\n<\/p>\n<p>When Bush closes the State of the Union by declaring &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Our generation<\/span> has dreams of its own,&#8221; he&#8217;s not <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thewho.net\/discography\/songs\/MyGeneration.html\">talkin&#8217; &#8217;bout<\/a> the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.greenday.net\/discography.html\">Green Day<\/a><br \/>\nremake. Bush is a&nbsp; champion of the Boomers. Consider tax cuts. The<br \/>\nfact that they are regressive<br \/>\ndoesn&#8217;t just hurt the poor: it also hurts the young while<br \/>\ndisproportionately benefiting 50-somethings who are at the peak of<br \/>\ntheir<br \/>\nlifetime earning potential. Bush&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.businessweek.com\/bwdaily\/dnflash\/feb2005\/nf2005023_2151_db045.htm\">endless deficit<\/a> simply shifts the cost of that tax cut windfall to post-Boomers.<\/p>\n<p>Bush&#8217;s Social Security plan smacks of the same favoritism while<br \/>\nplaying off the fears and stupidity of the young. Convince Gen-X and -Y<br \/>\nthat Social Security won&#8217;t be there for<br \/>\nthem at all, and they&#8217;ll settle for half a loaf. Then borrow <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">their <\/span>money &#8212; anywhere from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2005\/02\/03\/national\/03sbox.html\">$754 million<\/a> through 2015 to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2005\/02\/03\/politics\/03dtext.html\">$2 trillion<\/a> &#8212; to pay for that half-baked plan. Close the deal by persuading the Boomers that they&#8217;re doing their kids a favor.\n<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s Boomer-style problem-solving: get the satisfaction of doing<br \/>\ngood work without paying anything. It takes a grayer head to cut<br \/>\nthrough the economic pandering: &#8220;I&#8217;ve heard nothing about <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">sacrifice<\/span>.<br \/>\nNow I was a child in World War II, but I distinctly remember we had<br \/>\nthings like excess profits taxes, we had things like luxury taxes&#8230; We<br \/>\ntalk about what our soldiers are sacrificing, and we&#8217;re not talking<br \/>\nabout ourselves.&#8221; (Mary Alice Ginzer, interviewed on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.npr.org\/templates\/story\/story.php?storyId=4476512\">Morning Edition<\/a>).\n<\/p>\n<p>Bush&#8217;s Social Security plan doesn&#8217;t rob Paul to pay Peter: it robs<br \/>\nPaul to pay Paul&#8217;s father Jona. Maybe our generation is willing to<br \/>\nundertake that burden. But sell it like it is: a gift to the parent,<br \/>\nnot the child.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bush&#8217;s Social Security rhetoric is squarely pitched at my generation, prophesying 2042, when I will be 67, as the doomsday year when Social Security will finally go bust. And his quasi-privitization solution has some appealing features, most of all the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/anderkoo\/2005\/02\/social-security-reform-robbing-paul-to-pay-jona\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":271,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[96],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/anderkoo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/anderkoo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/anderkoo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/anderkoo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/271"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/anderkoo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/anderkoo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/anderkoo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/anderkoo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/anderkoo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}