{"id":36,"date":"2016-05-01T18:12:32","date_gmt":"2016-05-01T18:12:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.harvard.edu\/aabdelkhalik\/?p=36"},"modified":"2016-05-01T19:38:23","modified_gmt":"2016-05-01T19:38:23","slug":"36","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/aabdelkhalik\/2016\/05\/01\/36\/","title":{"rendered":"The Self: Khudi vs. Nafs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Picture of my math equation: http:\/\/imgur.com\/RHZAHvR<\/p>\n<p>In this post I wanted to bring light to a concept that I found very interesting in the Week 11 readings and that was the idea of \u201cthe self\u201d. More specifically, the <i>khudi<\/i> and the <i>nafs<\/i>. Before I begin explaining my creation, I will briefly describe the difference between the <i>khudi<\/i> and the <i>nafs <\/i>just in case some of you have never heard of them (If so you\u2019re not alone, I hadn\u2019t before taking this course)<i>.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>The khudi is defined in the reading<i> Iqbal and His Message<\/i> by Ralph Russell as \u201cour full potentialities for positive action\u201d. Thus it is a more outwardly understanding of the self in contrast to more common understandings. The <i>khudi<\/i> was first defined by the early-20th century pakistani poet Muhammad Iqbal in his poem <i>Asrar e Khudi <\/i>(Secrets of the Self). Iqbal\u2019s notion of the <i>khudi<\/i> was motivated by a couple of verses from the Quran, the main one being chapter 23, verse 14 in which God is described as <i>ahsan ul Khaliqin <\/i>&#8211; \u2018the best of creators\u2019. Although most scholars have interpreted the word \u201cbest\u201d as simply meaning \u201csupremely good\u201d, Iqbal concluded from the use of the word \u201cbest\u201d that there must be other creators besides God Himself (since He isn\u2019t described as \u2018the Creator\u2019). And from this, Iqbal believes that God\u2019s most important co-creator is Man (mankind). So in his poetry, Iqbal emphasizes this idea that we all need to discover our full potentialities for positive action and make full use of them, because only then will we be developing our <i>khudi<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, another understanding of the \u201cself\u201d is the <i>nafs. <\/i>In contrast to the <i>khudi<\/i>, the <i>nafs<\/i> is a more inward spiritual perception of the self. It is commonly defined as the \u201cpsyche\u201d, \u201cego\u201d, or the \u201csoul\u201d. In Sufism, it is believed that there are three principle \u201cstages of the nafs\u201d which describe the process of development, refinement and mastery of the <i>nafs<\/i>. The ultimate goal for Sufis is to completely let go of their egos to the point where they become one with the divine and only experience love with all of God\u2019s creations, and so the \u201cthree stages of nafs\u201d reflect this journey. The first stage is known as \u201cthe inciting <i>nafs<\/i> (<i>an-nafs al-\u02beamm\u0101rah<\/i>)\u201d which is the most primitive stage describing someone who is egotistical and as a result commits evil actions. The second stage is \u201cthe self-accusing nafs (an-nafs al-luww\u0101mah)\u201d and this is where &#8220;the conscience is awakened and the self accuses one for listening to one\u2019s ego. One repents and asks for forgiveness.&#8221;(1). Lastly, the final stage and the goal for all Sufis is \u201cthe <i>nafs<\/i> at peace (<i>an-nafs al-mu\u1e6dma\u02beinnah<\/i>)\u201d in which the soul reaches a state of tranquility. At this point, Sufis are able to let go of all worldly problems and are satisfied with the will of God. Therefore we can see that the <i>nafs<\/i> is a much more inwardly understanding of the <i>self<\/i> in contrast to Iqbal\u2019s notion of the <i>khudi<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>In my opinion, both the <i>khudi<\/i> and the <i>nafs<\/i> are essential for maintaining our well-beings on this earth because they both provide us with purpose and inner peace respectively. Therefore I believe that they are both equally important to all of us. So for my creation, I decided to highlight the importance of these two ideas through a math equation (see picture above). As a Statistics concentrator this came naturally. In my math equation x represents the <i>khudi<\/i>, y represents the <i>nafs,<\/i> and z represents the distance away from maximum well-being on this earth. So <b>the objective is to have z be as close to zero as possible<\/b>. X and y can only take on the values of 0 or 1 indicating whether or not the individual is striving to develop their <i>khudi<\/i> or to attain a <i>nafs at peace<\/i>. In addition, both x and y cannot be 0 simultaneously because we will assume that everyone who\u2019s reading this blog post is either striving for x or y. And so as shown in my equation, the objective is satisfied when x and y are both equal to 1 (z=0) suggesting that a person who strives to develop their <i>khudi<\/i> AND attain a <i>nafs at peace<\/i> will maximize their well-being on this earth. When someone strives for either one or the other, they will either lose sight of God (in the case of <i>khudi<\/i>) or lose sight of the earth\/worldly matters (in the case of <i>nafs<\/i>). And just to make it clear, this is merely a reflection of what I personally believe. Nevertheless, I thought this was a simple and creative way of combining and highlighting the importance of both Iqbal\u2019s <i>khudi <\/i>and Sufism\u2019s <i>nafs. <\/i><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>I hope you enjoyed this post and learned something new!<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Best,<\/p>\n<p>Aly<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>(1) Al-Haqqani, Shaykh Adil; Kabbani, Shaykh Hisham (2004). <i>The Path to Spiritual \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Excellence<\/i>. Islamic Supreme Council of America (ISCA). pp. 102\u2013103.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Picture of my math equation: http:\/\/imgur.com\/RHZAHvR In this post I wanted to bring light to a concept that I found very interesting in the Week 11 readings and that was the idea of \u201cthe self\u201d. More specifically, the khudi and the nafs. Before I begin explaining my creation, I will briefly describe the difference between [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7965,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/aabdelkhalik\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/aabdelkhalik\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/aabdelkhalik\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/aabdelkhalik\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7965"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/aabdelkhalik\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/aabdelkhalik\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":72,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/aabdelkhalik\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36\/revisions\/72"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/aabdelkhalik\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/aabdelkhalik\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/aabdelkhalik\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}